Stop Harassment and Intimidations in Elections through Legal Defenses (SHIELD) Our Elections Act
In committee: it can still change before the session ends.
- Stage
- In committee
- Started in
- Senate
- Sponsors
- +4
- Latest action
- Jul 23
Where it stands
Introduced (Done)
Committee (Current step)
Floor (Not started)
Law (Not started)
What it does
The bill would create a private right of action for individuals harmed by certain federal election interference crimes, allowing them to seek court orders to stop such violations and recover attorney's fees. It would extend the statute of limitations for prosecuting specific election interference offenses—including troop presence at polls, armed forces interference, voter intimidation, and related violations under the Voting Rights Act and National Voter Registration Act—to 9 years from the date of the offense. Additionally, the bill would restrict state and federal law enforcement from seizing ballots or election equipment before any recount, audit, or legal challenge is conclusively resolved, unless a judge finds clear and convincing evidence of imminent destruction, and would establish a grant program to help states implement ballot materials tracking systems.
AI summary · The lawmakers haven’t published an official summary of this bill yet, so 52 wrote this one from the bill’s text.
What moved
Who is involved
- Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]Lead sponsor
- Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]Co-sponsor
- Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]Co-sponsor
- Sen. Hickenlooper, John W. [D-CO]Co-sponsor
- Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI]Co-sponsor
- Sen. King, Angus S., Jr. [I-ME]Co-sponsor
Sponsors
The lawmakers who put their names on it, lead sponsors first.
In the news
Reporting that may mention this subject. Possible matches are labeled.
Loading coverage…
Work with this bill
Where it goes next
While a bill can still move, the questions are about people and money.
- Who sits in the seats that vote on itA roster is not a certified tally, and a filing is not a place on the ballot.
- Who funds the people decidingA receipt is not backing. A contribution does not establish a policy motive.
- Who is paid to be heardNaming an institution is the filer's account, not a record of any meeting.
- Bills still moving in CongressNewest first, the ones that can still change