Skip to content

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "The Fair Credit Reporting Act's Limited Preemption of State Laws".

In committee: it can still change before the session ends.

US HJRES 170 · House Joint Resolution · 119th Congress

Stage
In committee
Started in
House
Sponsor
1
Latest action
Apr 30, 2026

What it does

This joint resolution seeks to overturn a rule issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection that withdrew a previous regulation concerning the limited preemption of state laws under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. If enacted, the resolution would nullify the Bureau’s rule, meaning it would have no legal force or effect. The measure affects financial regulations governing how federal and state laws interact in the area of credit reporting, particularly impacting state authority to regulate consumer financial practices. It was introduced in the House and referred to the Committee on Financial Services for further consideration.

No official summary is available here. This one was written by AI from the bill’s text.

Read the full textRead it on the official site

Where it stands

  1. Introduced (Done)

    Apr 30, 2026

  2. Committee (Current step)

    In committee · Apr 30, 2026

  3. Floor (Not started)

  4. Law (Not started)

What moved

Loading recorded actions…

Who is involved

Sponsors

The lawmakers who put their names on it, lead sponsors first.

In the news

Reporting that may mention this subject. Possible matches are labeled.

Loading coverage…

Where it goes next

While a bill can still move, the questions are about people and money.

Work with this bill

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "The Fair Credit Reporting Act's Limited Preemption of State Laws". | 52