The bills, people and money around Port of Oakland.
California
In the news
Reporting on up to 20 of the bills shown here. This is a sample, and coverage may be incomplete.
Loading coverage…
Public lands: City of Oakland: Port of Oakland: uses of after-acquired lands.California · SB 304 · Last action Oct 10, 2025This bill would lift, until February 1, 2066, the use restrictions imposed by the granting statutes and the public trust doctrine for after-acquired lands, as defined, in Jack London Square and would authorize the Port of Oakland to lease the after-acquired lands for any purpose subject to specified conditions.Latest action: Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 578, Statutes of 2025.Enacted law
â€"580 Marine Highway.California · AB 13 · Last action Feb 1, 2018This bill would require the department to implement and oversee the —580 Marine Highway corridor project to reduce traffic by facilitating a permanent shift in container traffic away from truck transport to marine transport between the Port of Oakland and the Port of Stockton.Latest action: From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.Failed
California Environmental Quality Act: Port of Oakland: coal shipment.California · SB 1278 · Last action Apr 4, 2016This bill would require every public agency with discretionary approval of any portion of a project relating to the shipment of coal through the Port of Oakland to prepare or cause to be prepared an EIR.Latest action: April 5 hearing postponed by committee.Session ended
Board of Port Commissioners of Oakland.California · SB 375 · Last action Feb 1, 2000Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.Latest action: Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.Session ended
California Environmental Quality Act: supplemental environmental impact report: City of Oakland: coal shipment.California · SB 1277 · Last action Aug 11, 2016The act also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment.Latest action: August 11 hearing. Held in committee and under submission.Session ended
Listed by relevance and date. A bill is not a law. Showing the last snapshot while it refreshes.