- Stage
- Became law
- Started in
- Senate
- Sponsor
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
- Latest action
- Sep 13, 2023
What it does
(1) Existing law, operative as of January 1, 2024, will, in a case in which the party bearing the burden of proof proffers expert testimony regarding medical causation and the party's expert is required as a condition of testifying to opine that causation exists to a reasonable medical probability, allow the party not bearing the burden of proof to offer the testimony of a contrary expert only if the expert can testify that a proffered alternative cause exists to a reasonable medical probability or that a matter cannot meet a reasonable degree of probability in the applicable field, as specified.
Where it stands
This bill passed and is now law.
Introduced (Done)
Committee (Done)
Floor (Done)
Law (Done)
What moved
Who is involved
Sponsors
The lawmakers who put their names on it, lead sponsors first.
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
In the news
Reporting that may mention this subject. Possible matches are labeled.
Loading coverage…
Where it goes next
It is law in California. What happens now is up to the agency that carries it out, the courts, and the place itself.