Skip to content

Inverse condemnation: comparative fault.

This bill did not become law and its session has ended, so it can no longer move. It would have to be reintroduced.

CA AB 328 · Assembly Bill · 2011–2012

Stage
Session ended
Started in
Assembly
Sponsor
1
Latest action
Jan 24, 2012

What it does

(1) Existing law prohibits the taking of private property without the payment of just compensation and permits a person to maintain an action in inverse condemnation for the purpose of obtaining compensation for a taking. Existing law applies the doctrine of comparative fault for the purpose of apportioning responsibility and reducing damages to the extent a plaintiff is found partially at fault.

Read the full text

Where it stands

This bill did not become law and its session has ended, so it can no longer move. It would have to be reintroduced.

  1. Introduced (Done)

  2. Committee (Done)

  3. Floor (Current step)

    Passed first chamber · Jan 24, 2012

  4. Law (Needs attention)

    The session ended first

What moved

Loading recorded actions…

Who is involved

Sponsors

The lawmakers who put their names on it, lead sponsors first.

In the news

Reporting that may mention this subject. Possible matches are labeled.

Loading coverage…

Where it goes next

While a bill can still move, the questions are about people and money in California.

Work with this bill

Inverse condemnation: comparative fault. | 52