- Stage
- Became law
- Sponsors
- 34
- Latest action
- May 2, 2022
What it does
AN ACT TO DECLARE THAT THE PRACTICE OF DISCRIMINATION BASED ON VACCINATION STATUS IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE IDEALS OF SOUTH CAROLINA; TO PROVIDE THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY BELIEVES THAT A FEDERAL VACCINE MANDATE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL; TO PROVIDE THAT THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION MAY NOT ENACT A COVID-19 VACCINATION MANDATE; TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 8-15-80 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT NEITHER THE STATE NOR ANY OF ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS MAY TERMINATE OR SUSPEND A FIRST RESPONDER BASED ON HIS VACCINATION STATUS; TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS; TO PROVIDE THAT NOTHING IN THIS ACT SHALL PREVENT AN EMPLOYER FROM ENCOURAGING OR…
Where it stands
This bill passed and is now law.
Introduced (Done)
Committee (Done)
Floor (Done)
Law (Done)
What moved
Who is involved
Sponsors
The lawmakers who put their names on it, lead sponsors first.
- Adam Morgan
- Anne Thayer
- Ashley Trantham
- Bennett
- Bill Chumley
- Bill Hixon
- Bill Taylor
- Bobby Cox
- Cal Forrest
- Chip Huggins
- Chris Murphy
- Chris Wooten
- Davis
- Jason Elliott
- Joe Bustos
- John McCravy
- Jonathon D. Hill
- Josiah Magnuson
- Mandy W. Kimmons
- Mark Smith
- Mark Willis
- Melissa Oremus
- Merita A. "Rita" Allison
- Mike Burns
- Nathan Ballentine
- Patrick Haddon
- Roger Nutt
- Russell W. Fry
- Ryan McCabe
- Steven Long
- Stewart Jones
- Tommy M. Stringer
- Travis Moore
- V. Stephen "Steve" Moss
In the news
Reporting that may mention this subject. Possible matches are labeled.
Loading coverage…
Where it goes next
Once a bill is decided, the questions are about what is done with it in South Carolina.