Skip to content

Victim restitution: jurisdiction.

This bill did not become law and its session has ended, so it can no longer move. It would have to be reintroduced.

CA AB 2477 · Assembly Bill · 2015–2016

Stage
Session ended
Started in
Assembly
Sponsors
3
Latest action
Apr 21, 2016

What it does

Existing law requires a court to impose a separate and additional restitution fine in each case in which a person is convicted of a crime. If the economic losses of a victim cannot be ascertained at the time of sentencing, existing law requires a court to retain jurisdiction over a person subject to a restitution order for purposes of imposing or modifying restitution until such time as the losses may be determined. Two state appellate court decisions have held that under state law a court acts in excess of its jurisdiction by ordering restitution or modifying a restitution order after the explanation of a defendant's probation.

Read the full text

Where it stands

This bill did not become law and its session has ended, so it can no longer move. It would have to be reintroduced.

  1. Introduced (Done)

  2. Committee (Current step)

    In committee · Apr 21, 2016

  3. Floor (Needs attention)

    The session ended first

  4. Law (Not started)

What moved

Loading recorded actions…

Who is involved

Sponsors

The lawmakers who put their names on it, lead sponsors first.

In the news

Reporting that may mention this subject. Possible matches are labeled.

Loading coverage…

Where it goes next

While a bill can still move, the questions are about people and money in California.

Work with this bill

Victim restitution: jurisdiction. | 52