Relating to immigration-related practices; and prescribing an effective date.
It became law on Apr 6, 2026.
- Stage
- Became law
- Started in
- House
- Sponsors
- 42
- Latest action
- Apr 6, 2026
What it does
Provides that evidence of a party's or a witness's immigration status is not admissible as evidence in a civil proceeding. Provides exceptions. Makes it unlawful for employers to discriminate, retaliate or take other adverse action against an employee because the employee updates, or attempts to update, the employee's personal information based on a lawful change to the employee's employment authorization documentation. Clarifies what actions constitute an unlawful practice. For purposes of law enforcement profiling requirements, modifies the definition of "profiling" to include immigration status. Takes effect on the 91st day following adjournment sine die.
Where it stands
This bill passed and is now law.
Introduced (Done)
Committee (Done)
Floor (Done)
Law (Done)
What moved
Who is involved
Sponsors
The lawmakers who put their names on it, lead sponsors first.
- Cyrus Javadi
- Dacia Grayber
- Deb Patterson
- Farrah Chaichi
- Floyd Prozanski
- Hai Pham
- Khanh Pham
- Lisa Fragala
- Sara Gelser Blouin
- Tom Andersen
- Willy Chotzen
- Anthony Broadman
- Ben Bowman
- Chris Gorsek
- Courtney Neron Misslin
- Daniel Nguyen
- Janeen Sollman
- Jason Kropf
- Jeff Golden
- Jules Walters
- Kayse Jama
- Ken Helm
- Lamar Wise
- Lesly Muñoz
- Lew Frederick
- Lisa Reynolds
- Mari Watanabe
- Mark Gamba
- Mark Meek
- Nancy Nathanson
- Nathan Sosa
- Pam Marsh
- Paul Evans
- Rob Nosse
- Sarah McDonald
- Shannon Isadore
- Sue Rieke Smith
- Susan McLain
- Thuy Tran
- Travis Nelson
- Wlnsvey Campos
- Zach Hudson
In the news
Reporting that may mention this subject. Possible matches are labeled.
Loading coverage…
Where it goes next
Once a bill is decided, the questions are about what is done with it in Oregon.