Skip to content

Pricing Sign in

MinnesotaCare premiums exemption for women; continuous coverage during postpartum period commissioner of human services recommendations requirement

This bill did not become law and its session has ended, so it can no longer move. It would have to be reintroduced.

MN SF 37 · Sf · 2020s5

Stage: Session ended
Sponsors: 5
Latest action: Oct 15, 2020

Where it stands

Introduced (Current step)
Introduced · Oct 15, 2020
Committee (Needs attention)
The session ended first
Floor (Not started)
Law (Not started)

This bill did not become law and its session has ended, so it can no longer move. It would have to be reintroduced.

Read the full text

What moved

Who is involved

Sponsors

The lawmakers who put their names on it, lead sponsors first.

John MartyLead sponsor
Karla BighamCo-sponsor
Melisa López FranzenCo-sponsor
NelsonCo-sponsor
Susan KentCo-sponsor

In the news

Reporting that may mention this subject. Possible matches are labeled.

Loading coverage…

Where it goes next

While a bill can still move, the questions are about people and money in Minnesota.

Who sits in the seats that vote on itA roster is not a certified tally, and a filing is not a place on the ballot.
Who funds the people decidingA receipt is not backing. A contribution does not establish a policy motive.
Who is paid to be heardNaming an institution is the filer's account, not a record of any meeting.

Work with this bill

MinnesotaCare premiums exemption for women; continuous coverage during postpartum period commissioner of human services recommendations requirement | 52