Skip to content

Cases — 4356532

1 recorded connections shown. Select a record, office or person to follow its source references.

Start with
and connect to

Browse all held record sources

Zoom to read. Drag to explore. Select a connection.

Cases — 4356532

Cases · As of Oct 2, 2026

Cases — 4356532: 1 outgoing connections shown. Point at anyone to see how they are linked.Showing bounded source connections. Dates come from the held records; missing relationships remain unknown.

The source record

As of Oct 2, 2026.

Activity name
LKQ CORPORATION, LKQ SOUTHEAST, INC., AND LKQ PICK YOUR PART SOUTHEAST LLC,,
Case number
04-2022-0308
Case name
LKQ CORPORATION, LKQ SOUTHEAST, INC., AND LKQ PICK YOUR PART SOUTHEAST LLC,,
Region code
04
Fiscal year
2022
Activity type code
AFR
Activity type desc
Administrative - Formal
Activity status code
CLS
Activity status desc
Closed
Activity status date
2023-03-02
Lead agency
EPA
Case status date
2023-03-02
Enforcement outcome code
ECP
Enforcement outcome desc
Final Order With Penalty
Voluntary self disclosure
false
Multimedia flag
false
Summary text
FEBRUARY 6 ,2023 - CONSENT AGREEMENT: TDEC issued the Storm Water Multi-Sector Permit for stormwater discharges from industrial activities, Permit No. TNR050000 ( Permit ). The Permit for the site was first effective on October 11, 2016, and expired on April 14, 2020. The Permit was reissued on July 20, 2020, and expires on June 30, 2025. Section 7.2 of the Permit states that an expired general permit continues in force and effect until a new general permit is issued. The site, therefore, was still operating under an effective Permit between the Permit expiration on April 14, 2020, and reissuance on July 20, 2020. Coverage under the Permit is obtained by submitting a Notice of Intent (''NOI ) to TDEC. On September 27, 2016, Respondents submitted an NOI to TDEC requesting coverage under the Permit for the Facility. The authorization became effective on October 11, 2016, and expires on June 30, 2025, and requires Respondents to comply with all provisions of the Permit. On January 14, 2021, the EPA sent an Information Request Letter ( Information Request ), pursuant to Section 308 of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. ? 1318, to Respondents requesting information related to Respondents' stonnwater management practices at the Facility to assess compliance with the CWA, the regulations promulgated thereunder at 40 C.F.R. ? 122.26, and the Permit. On January 28, 2021, Respondents sent a response to the EPA's Information Request. On July 9, 2021, the EPA issued the Notice of Violation and Opportunity to Show Cause to the Respondents pursuant to Section 309(a) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. ? 1319. On August 17, 2021, the EPA held, and Respondents participated in, a show cause meeting. Based on the review of the Respondents' response to the Information Request and the show cause meeting, the EPA determined that the Respondents had the following deficiencies: (a) The Facility's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) did not include the additional measures required in the permit for facilities discharging to streams considered either Exceptional Tennessee Water or waters with unavailable parameters. (b) The Respondents failed to perform required annual benchmark monitoring at the permitted outfalls. As a result of the review of the information obtained from the Information Request and information received at the show cause meeting, the EPA has determined that stormwater associated with industrial activity was discharged from the Facility within the meaning of Section 402(p) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. ? 1342(p), and its implementing regulations into waters of the United States. Based on the review of the information obtained from the Information Request and information received at the show cause meeting, the Respondents have violated Section 301 of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. ? 1311, due to Respondents? failure to comply with the Permit and the CWA implementing regulations. Specifically, the EPA alleges the following violations: (a) Part 4.6 of the Permit requires facilities discharging to waters with unavailable parameters or considered an Exceptional Tennessee Water to include additional requirements in their SWPPP including, but not limited to, additional inspections, expedited responses to issues identified during inspections, and additional documentation and certifications. From the review of the facility's SWPPP, EPA determined that the plan did not contain the additional requirements discussed in Part 4.6 of the Permit. (b) Part 11, Sector N (Part 5.1) of the Permit requires the permittee to monitor stormwater discharges associated with industrial activities at least once per permit year. From the review of docwnents provided in response to the Information Request, EPA documented the Respondents as having not performed any benchmark monitoring since November 2017.
Created at
2026-10-02T02:02:59.061315+00:00
Updated at
2026-10-02T02:02:59.061315+00:00