HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary…
12 links on this map: who funds them, what they touched, and who lobbied on it. Select anyone to move the map to them.
Start with
and connect to
Browse all held record sources
Zoom to read. Drag to explore. Select a connection.
HR 5599
To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary appropriations, and for other purposes
Congress · In committee
Every link on this map
The same connections as a table, with the reason each one is here.
| Timothy A. Perry | Gave to its sponsors | Timothy A. Perry gave $21K to a sponsor of HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary…. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $21K |
| Edward A. Wiese | Gave to its sponsors | Edward A. Wiese gave $17K to a sponsor of HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary…. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $17K |
| Dennis Weinman | Gave to its sponsors | Dennis Weinman gave $14K to a sponsor of HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary…. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $14K |
| Philip Rettger | Gave to its sponsors | Philip Rettger gave $14K to a sponsor of HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary…. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $14K |
| Jason M. ST. John | Gave to its sponsors | Jason M. ST. John gave $14K to a sponsor of HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary…. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $14K |
| Greyson Williams | Gave to its sponsors | Greyson Williams gave $14K to a sponsor of HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary…. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $14K |
| James C. Davis | Gave to its sponsors | James C. Davis gave $13K to a sponsor of HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary…. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $13K |
| Lawrence E. Julio | Gave to its sponsors | Lawrence E. Julio gave $12K to a sponsor of HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary…. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $12K |
| Johnny Olszewski | Sponsors | Johnny Olszewski sponsored HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary…. | None |
| National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association | Lobbied on it | National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association named HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary… in 6 lobbying reports. | 6 reports |
| National Treasury Employees Union | Lobbied on it | National Treasury Employees Union named HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary… in 6 lobbying reports. | 6 reports |
| To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary appropriations, and for other purposes. | Source records | HR 5599: To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary… has an explicit source reference to To prohibit the removal of Federal employees during any lapse in discretionary appropriations, and for other purposes.. | None |
In the news
Reporting about the selected subject. Articles are context and do not establish a connection on this map.
Loading coverage…