SB 498
17 links on this map: who funds them, what they touched, and who lobbied on it. Select anyone to move the map to them.
Start with
and connect to
Gave to its sponsors8 of 30
California Democratic Party$4.2MFresno County Democratic Central Committee$300KSan Mateo County Democratic Central Committee$300KSan Diego County Democratic Party$200KTehama County Democratic Central Committee$200KDemocratic Party Of Orange County$100KNapa County Democratic Central Committee$100KAssociation Of California School Administrators Pac Small Contributor Committee$83KSB 498
Trade Corridors Improvement Fund: grant program: short-line railroads
California · In committee
Lobbied on it8 of 10
Arizona & California Railroad Company3 reportsCalifornia Northern Railroad Company3 reportsCentral Oregon & Pacific Railroad Inc.3 reportsSan Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad Company, Inc.3 reportsSan Joaquin Valley Railroad Co.3 reportsVentura County Railroad Company3 reportsOxnard Harbor District/Port of Hueneme2 reportsAlameda Corridor-East Construction Authority1 reportEvery link on this map
The same connections as a table, with the reason each one is here.
| California Democratic Party | Gave to its sponsors | California Democratic Party gave $4.2M to a sponsor of SB 498. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $4.2M |
| Fresno County Democratic Central Committee | Gave to its sponsors | Fresno County Democratic Central Committee gave $300K to a sponsor of SB 498. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $300K |
| San Mateo County Democratic Central Committee | Gave to its sponsors | San Mateo County Democratic Central Committee gave $300K to a sponsor of SB 498. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $300K |
| San Diego County Democratic Party | Gave to its sponsors | San Diego County Democratic Party gave $200K to a sponsor of SB 498. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $200K |
| Tehama County Democratic Central Committee | Gave to its sponsors | Tehama County Democratic Central Committee gave $200K to a sponsor of SB 498. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $200K |
| Democratic Party Of Orange County | Gave to its sponsors | Democratic Party Of Orange County gave $100K to a sponsor of SB 498. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $100K |
| Napa County Democratic Central Committee | Gave to its sponsors | Napa County Democratic Central Committee gave $100K to a sponsor of SB 498. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $100K |
| Association Of California School Administrators Pac Small Contributor Committee | Gave to its sponsors | Association Of California School Administrators Pac Small Contributor Committee gave $83K to a sponsor of SB 498. A gift is not a position on the bill. | $83K |
| Melissa Hurtado | Sponsors | Melissa Hurtado sponsored SB 498. | None |
| Arizona & California Railroad Company | Lobbied on it | Arizona & California Railroad Company named SB 498 in 3 lobbying reports. | 3 reports |
| California Northern Railroad Company | Lobbied on it | California Northern Railroad Company named SB 498 in 3 lobbying reports. | 3 reports |
| Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad Inc. | Lobbied on it | Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad Inc. named SB 498 in 3 lobbying reports. | 3 reports |
| San Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad Company, Inc. | Lobbied on it | San Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad Company, Inc. named SB 498 in 3 lobbying reports. | 3 reports |
| San Joaquin Valley Railroad Co. | Lobbied on it | San Joaquin Valley Railroad Co. named SB 498 in 3 lobbying reports. | 3 reports |
| Ventura County Railroad Company | Lobbied on it | Ventura County Railroad Company named SB 498 in 3 lobbying reports. | 3 reports |
| Oxnard Harbor District/Port of Hueneme | Lobbied on it | Oxnard Harbor District/Port of Hueneme named SB 498 in 2 lobbying reports. | 2 reports |
| Alameda Corridor-East Construction Authority | Lobbied on it | Alameda Corridor-East Construction Authority named SB 498 in 1 lobbying report. | 1 report |