SB 792
9 links on this map: who funds them, what they touched, and who lobbied on it. Select anyone to move the map to them.
Start with
and connect to
Sponsors3 cosponsors more
Steve GlazerCalifornia lawmaker · DSB 792
Sales and use tax: returns: online transactions: local jurisdiction schedule
California · Vetoed
Lobbied on it8 of 26
DoorDash, Inc.7 reportsCendejas and Associates, Inc.; Robert E.3 reportsCity of Perris3 reportsCity of Walnut Creek3 reportsCalifornia Taxpayers Association and Affiliated Enitty California Tax Foundation2 reportsCity of Cupertino2 reportsCity of Fresno2 reportsCity of Sacramento2 reportsEvery link on this map
The same connections as a table, with the reason each one is here.
| Steve Glazer | Sponsors | Steve Glazer sponsored SB 792. | None |
| DoorDash, Inc. | Lobbied on it | DoorDash, Inc. named SB 792 in 7 lobbying reports. | 7 reports |
| Cendejas and Associates, Inc.; Robert E. | Lobbied on it | Cendejas and Associates, Inc.; Robert E. named SB 792 in 3 lobbying reports. | 3 reports |
| City of Perris | Lobbied on it | City of Perris named SB 792 in 3 lobbying reports. | 3 reports |
| City of Walnut Creek | Lobbied on it | City of Walnut Creek named SB 792 in 3 lobbying reports. | 3 reports |
| California Taxpayers Association and Affiliated Enitty California Tax Foundation | Lobbied on it | California Taxpayers Association and Affiliated Enitty California Tax Foundation named SB 792 in 2 lobbying reports. | 2 reports |
| City of Cupertino | Lobbied on it | City of Cupertino named SB 792 in 2 lobbying reports. | 2 reports |
| City of Fresno | Lobbied on it | City of Fresno named SB 792 in 2 lobbying reports. | 2 reports |
| City of Sacramento | Lobbied on it | City of Sacramento named SB 792 in 2 lobbying reports. | 2 reports |