HB 355

10 links on this map: who funds them, what they touched, and who lobbied on it. Select anyone to move the map to them.

Start with

and connect to

Every link on this map

The same connections as a table, with the reason each one is here.

Sort by

Connections of HB 355

A Vote	Gave to its sponsors	A Vote gave $53K to a sponsor of HB 355. A gift is not a position on the bill.	$53K
Farmpac	Gave to its sponsors	Farmpac gave $22K to a sponsor of HB 355. A gift is not a position on the bill.	$22K
Progress Pac	Gave to its sponsors	Progress Pac gave $20K to a sponsor of HB 355. A gift is not a position on the bill.	$20K
Arpac	Gave to its sponsors	Arpac gave $16K to a sponsor of HB 355. A gift is not a position on the bill.	$16K
Trial	Gave to its sponsors	Trial gave $15K to a sponsor of HB 355. A gift is not a position on the bill.	$15K
Alabama Power State Pac	Gave to its sponsors	Alabama Power State Pac gave $10K to a sponsor of HB 355. A gift is not a position on the bill.	$10K
Poarch Band Of Creek Indians Funds Account	Gave to its sponsors	Poarch Band Of Creek Indians Funds Account gave $7,500 to a sponsor of HB 355. A gift is not a position on the bill.	$7,500
Carepac	Gave to its sponsors	Carepac gave $6,500 to a sponsor of HB 355. A gift is not a position on the bill.	$6,500
Prince Chestnut	Sponsors	Prince Chestnut sponsored HB 355.	None
Municipalities, Class 5, 6, 7, and 8, rehiring of retired law enforcement officers, authorized under certain conditions	Source records	HB 355 has an explicit source reference to Municipalities, Class 5, 6, 7, and 8, rehiring of retired law enforcement officers, authorized under certain conditions.	None

Reporting about the selected subject. Articles are context and do not establish a connection on this map.

Loading coverage…