AB 662
9 links on this map: who funds them, what they touched, and who lobbied on it. Select anyone to move the map to them.
Start with
and connect to
Browse all held record sources
Zoom to read. Drag to explore. Select a connection.
AB 662
Local government: redevelopment: successor agencies to redevelopment agencies
California · Vetoed
Every link on this map
The same connections as a table, with the reason each one is here.
| Association of Bay Area Governments | Lobbied on it | Association of Bay Area Governments named AB 662 in 4 lobbying reports. | 4 reports |
| City of West Sacramento, Including the Sacramento-Yolo Port District | Lobbied on it | City of West Sacramento, Including the Sacramento-Yolo Port District named AB 662 in 4 lobbying reports. | 4 reports |
| Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority | Lobbied on it | Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority named AB 662 in 3 lobbying reports. | 3 reports |
| California Infill Federation | Lobbied on it | California Infill Federation named AB 662 in 2 lobbying reports. | 2 reports |
| City of Napa | Lobbied on it | City of Napa named AB 662 in 2 lobbying reports. | 2 reports |
| County of Santa Clara | Lobbied on it | County of Santa Clara named AB 662 in 2 lobbying reports. | 2 reports |
| State Association of County Auditors | Lobbied on it | State Association of County Auditors named AB 662 in 2 lobbying reports. | 2 reports |
| City of Bell | Lobbied on it | City of Bell named AB 662 in 1 lobbying report. | 1 report |
| Local government: redevelopment: successor agencies to redevelopment agencies. | Source records | AB 662 has an explicit source reference to Local government: redevelopment: successor agencies to redevelopment agencies.. | None |
In the news
Reporting about the selected subject. Articles are context and do not establish a connection on this map.
Loading coverage…