Question 2: Amend the state constitution to consider the totality of the circumstances when imposing and setting cash bail for persons accused of violent crimes, including circumstances related to a previous conviction of a violent crime, the probability the accused will not appear in court, the need to protect the community from serious harm as defined by the state legislature, the need to prevent witness intimidation, and the potential affirmative defenses of the accused
Passed with 67.6% yes.
- Yes
- 1,186,025
- 67.6%. The passing rule is not on file.
- No
- 569,286
- 32.4%
Qualified (Done)
On the ballot (Done)
Election day (Done)
Passed (Done)
What moved
How it got on the ballot
The legislature put it before voters.
In the news
Reporting that may mention this subject. Possible matches are labeled.
Loading coverage…
Also on this ballot
- Before itQuestion 1: Amend the state constitution to allow the state legislature to define what serious harm means in relation to the bail conditions that judges impose on accused persons released before their criminal trial, for the purpose of “[protecting] members of the community from serious harm."
- After itQuestion 3: Advise the state legislature to require "able-bodied, childless adults... to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits."
On the same ballot
- Question 3Advise the state legislature to require "able-bodied, childless adults... to look for work in order to receive taxpayer-funded welfare benefits."
- Question 1Amend the state constitution to allow the state legislature to define what serious harm means in relation to the bail conditions that judges impose on accused persons released before their criminal trial, for the purpose of “[protecting] members of the community from serious harm."