Proposition 312: Allow for property owners to apply for a property tax refund if the city or locality in which the property is located does not enforce laws or ordinances regarding illegal camping, loitering, obstructing public thoroughfares, panhandling, public urination or defecation, public consumption of alcoholic beverages, and possession or use of illegal substances
Passed with 58.6% yes.
- Yes
- 1,804,728
- 58.6%. Passing rule on file: >50%.
- No
- 1,274,031
- 41.4%
Qualified (Done)
On the ballot (Done)
Election day (Done)
Passed (Done)
What moved
How it got on the ballot
The legislature put it before voters.
In the news
Reporting that may mention this subject. Possible matches are labeled.
Loading coverage…
Also on this ballot
- Before itProposition 311: Establish a $20 fee on every conviction for a criminal offense, which would go to pay a benefit of $250,000 to the spouse or children of a first responder who is killed in the line of duty
- After itProposition 313: Require that anyone convicted of child sex trafficking be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole or release
On the same ballot
- Proposition 313Require that anyone convicted of child sex trafficking be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole or release
- Proposition 314Make it a state crime for noncitizens to enter the state at any location other than the port of entry; allow for state and local police to arrest noncitizens who cross the border unlawfully; allowing for state judges to order deportations; requiring the use of the E-Verify program in order to determine the immigration status of individuals before the enrollment in a financial aid or public welfare program; making it a Class 6 felony for individuals who submit false information or documents to an employer to evade detection of employment eligibility, or to apply for public benefits, and; make the sale of fentanyl a Class 2 felony if the person knowingly sells fentanyl and it results in the death of another person
- Proposition 315Prohibit a proposed rule from becoming effective if that rule is estimated to increase regulatory costs by more than $500,000 within five years after implementation, until the legislature enacts legislation ratifying the proposed rule
- Proposition 133Require partisan primary elections for partisan offices and prohibit primary elections where all candidates, regardless of political party affiliation, run in the same primary election, such as top-two, top-four, and top-five primaries